It's wonderful that you offer a 30 day free trial of your programs and I hate to look a gift horse in the mouth, but for people with busy schedules or health problems, when 30 days starts counting down the instant you first open, whether you use it or not, it's not much of a trial. If you can offer a trial program that counts days it's actually used instead of counting out a month from the first time it's opened, a person can actually get a chance to try it even if they have a busy schedule or don't feel well often enough. For example, I started up my trial and got through three of the 12 introduction and tutorial videos before I was too tired to continue. Nearly a week has passed and because of health issues, I haven't felt well enough to go back to it yet. That's 1/4th of my trial days gone already and it may be another half week or more before I feel well enough again already. It's exactly this reason I had been putting off starting the trial in the first place. I know my case isn't common, but there are a number of reasons a trial counter by days used would be better for many people and give more people a chance to actually try your product and figure if it's the right product for them, which could mean more sales for you. Btw, video 3 of 12 for Substance Painter doesn't even begin any texturing use yet, it's still going over what each tool tray is and does and how to move them around.

Right now each substance tool (Designer, Alchemist and Painter) has it's own library. I have an idea where all Substance software connected through Launcher or just library.
This will allow to have all materials, grunge maps, tools etc in one place, what is obvious, and this would be convenient for a user. For example if I load a material I have to put this material inside SP and Alchemist folders separately.
Also, single library would connect materials across Substance software, for example if I load a material from Source, modify it in Alchemist, save it to my library inside Alchemist and use it in SP directly. Super useful.
Else, there are a lot of content missing in SP from SD, like quantize, emboss, skew and many more! Single library would open all filters and content from SD to SP. There might be problem with utilities that cannot be cross-used in SP and SD, but tagging will solve this.